6300 Twenty-Two Mile Rd., Ste 3
Shelby Twp., MI  48317-2106
(586) 323-1200
Home Page About Us Services News Forms 'the' Numbers Contact Us Links Login
 

Recent  News



Retirement Contribution limits announced for 2012:

Maximum contribution limits for those under age 50 and the catch up amount for those 50 and over are as follows;

401(k)’s are $17,000 plus an additional $5,500 catch up if 50 or older.

Simple (savings incentive match plan for employees) plans are $11,500 plus an additional $2,500 catch up if 50 or older.

IRAs (individual retirement plans) are $5,000 plus an additional $1,000 catch up if 50 or older. The contribution can be split between a Roth IRA and a traditional IRA, but must not exceed $6,000.


Employees / Independent Contractors (1099s):

Generally, the degree of control you exercise over the worker determines whether he or she is an employee or independent contractor. For example, an employer would probably provide a workers' materials and tools, while independent contractors usually provide their own. An employer sets an employee's work hours while an independent contractor usually has the right to set his or her own schedule. In addition, the more "integrated" or central a job is to a company's operations, the more likely the worker is to be considered an employee.

The chart below can help you determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. Unfortunately, no single factor determines a worker's status. The IRS and other government agencies, as well as courts that hear related cases, examine a variety of factors.

To protect your organization, you can request documents from an independent contractor that will help you prove his or her status in the event the IRS or other government agencies ask for it. These include copies of advertising or directory listings, business name statements, an Employer Identification Number (if he or she has employees), and business licenses or professional licenses.

Employee

Independent Contractor

Worker must obey instructions concerning when or how to perform the job. Worker is responsible for the outcome of the job and can determine how it is to be done.
Company provides training.
 
Worker may be licensed by a state board and may have invested considerable sums in training.
Services must be performed by the worker. The company hires, supervises or pays a worker's assistants. Worker can hire assistants and is responsible for their pay.
 
The worker has an ongoing relationship with the company.
 
Worker advertises or otherwise makes his or her services available to the general public.
The company sets the work hours.
 
The worker can set his or her own hours.
 
The company requires full time work at its business.
 
Worker can work for more than one company at the same time.
The company controls where the work is performed and determines the order in which tasks are done The worker can complete tasks at his or her office or home. He or she decides how to finish the job.
The worker receives payment by hour, week or month.
 
Independent contractors are usually paid on a per job or commission basis.
The company provides tools and materials.

 
The worker provides his or her own tools, materials and facilities and has often made a significant investment in them.
The worker generally does not take on any financial risk and the company pays travel and business expenses.
 
The worker can realize a profit or loss from a job and generally pays the expenses incurred in completing the job.
 
The worker can usually quit without liability for failure to complete a job. The worker is liable for completing a job according to contract.


Issues Surrounding Final Paychecks

When an employee leaves your company, the complicated issue of the final paycheck arises. And how your company handles the check depends on state and federal laws, which can make it difficult for businesses operating in more than one state to come up with a uniform nationwide policy. State laws generally determine the timing of final paychecks based on whether the employee was fired, laid off, or quit. Depending on the state, deadlines for issuing the last check might be the employee's last day of work, the following business day, three business days, or the next scheduled payday. What your company includes in the final paycheck can depend on whether you pay the employee an hourly wage or a salary, as well as on your company's written policies regarding:

  • Severance pay;

  • Expenses;

  • Vacation, sick and personal days;

  • Bonuses;

  • Commissions; and

  • Other pay and benefit arrangements.

It's important to know the laws because your company could be assessed interest and penalties for non-compliance. In some cases, companies wind up paying legal fees if the employee resorts to legal action. One complex area in writing final paychecks involves employees who owe money to your company for any number of reasons, including:

  • Payroll advances;

  • Tuition payments;

  • Employee loans;

  • Unreturned equipment such as a company cell phone or laptop computer;

  • Purchases through payroll deductions; and

  • Prepaid leave.

You might be tempted to withhold the amount an employee owes, figuring that's the only way your company will collect the debt. That could be a mistake.
Withholding money for employee debts also falls under state laws - unless there is a conflict with federal law, which prohibits withholding if it reduces the final payment to below minimum wage. There is an exemption for withholding amounts for debts stemming from payroll advances. However, there can be a thin line between a payroll advance and a loan. In some cases, courts ruled that advances became loans at some point.

State withholding laws range from extremely restrictive to very liberal. When there is a statute, allowable withholding amounts can depend on the circumstances surrounding the debt and whether you pay the employee a salary or an hourly wage. Even if the individual receives a salary, if the debt stems from loans, prepaid leave, or unreturned equipment, it can be unclear whether an employee was actually salaried and exempt from overtime.

One common misconception is that a company can withhold amounts owed from the final paycheck if an employee signed a blanket authorization. But withholding authorizations must generally be voluntary and free from coercion. If your company, like many others, has all new hires sign blanket authorizations about policies, they can be interpreted as a requirement of employment and thus not voluntary.

One consideration is to ask an employee to sign a withholding authorization for a specific debt at the time the employee incurs it. That form should include a statement that the employee can revoke the authorization any time with two weeks prior notice. (See right-hand box for a New Hampshire case involving blanket authorizations.)

Caution: When it comes to final paychecks, the laws are complex. Consult with a professional who is knowledgeable about payroll laws, and state and federal labor department regulations.


14 Ways Wage-Hour Laws Can Create Risks:

A good time to ensure compliance! 

Federal investigators with the Labor Department's Wage and Hour Division (WHD) routinely look for companies and organizations with illegal pay practices. The WHD enforces the federal minimum wage, overtime pay, record-keeping, child labor and other requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act. When investigators uncover violations, employers must pay back wages, as well as penalties.

Now, the Department of Labor (DOL) is providing a smartphone "app" for employees to independently track their hours. "This app will help empower workers to understand and stand up for their rights when employers have denied their hard-earned pay," said Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis. For workers without smartphones, the WHD now has a printable calendar in English and Spanish to track pay rates, start and stop times, as well as arrival and departure times. Currently, the app is only compatible with the iPhone and iPod Touch, but the DOL wants to make it available for other platforms and add features to track tips, bonuses, commissions and more. With the introduction of the app, it's a good time for employers to ensure they are in compliance with the complex Fair Labor Standards Act. Here are 14 ways employers can get tripped up by wage-and-hour violations.

1. Failing to correctly classify non-exempt and exempt employees. This is the mistake investigators often target first. Determining employees who are legally exempt from the wage-and-hour laws can be complicated.

Here are the basic rules:

  • Covered nonexempt employees must receive overtime pay for hours worked over 40 per workweek at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular pay rate. (A 40-hour workweek is defined as any fixed and regularly recurring period of 168 hours over seven consecutive 24-hour periods.)

  • There's no limit on the hours that employees 16 years or older can work in a week as long as they are paid overtime.

  • The FLSA does not require extra pay for working weekends, holidays, or nights, unless overtime is involved.

2. Failing to calculate overtime pay correctly. This can occur when an employer doesn't include all earnings in the base, earned hourly pay. For example, let's say non-exempt employees earn mandatory bonuses over a period of time. An employer fails to recalculate the employees' hourly earnings for the period to include the bonuses. Mandatory bonuses earned for factors related to hours worked and length of employment are considered earned wages under the wage-and-hour laws.

3. Misclassifying employees as independent contractors. According to the WHD, the "misclassification of employees as independent contractors is an alarming trend, particularly in industries such as construction that often employ low-wage, vulnerable workers." Often, the WHD adds, "workers are deprived of overtime and minimum wages, forced to pay taxes that their employers are legally obligated to pay and left with no recourse if they are injured or discriminated against in the workplace." When the WHD finds cases of misclassification, it may refer the cases to state agencies and the IRS.

4. Failing to pay for work during missed meal and rest periods. Wage-and-hour laws require employers to pay non-exempt employees for all time worked -- whether or not it was authorized by an employer or supervisor. So if employees continue to work through meals and breaks of 20 minutes or less, employers are required to pay for the time. And when the extra time results in an employee putting in more than 40 hours in a workweek, the employer also owes overtime pay.

5. Failing to pay for certain on-call time. If an employer engages an employee to wait to be put to work, the individual must be paid for the on-call time.

6. Deducting an exempt employee's pay for poor performance. This violates one of the basic rules for determining employee status. An exempt employee must be paid the agreed-on salary without regard to the quality or quantity of the individual's performance during the pay period. When an employer takes money out of an exempt employee's salary for poor performance, it can result in permanently changing the employee's status from exempt to non-exempt.

7. Not paying for employees to work electronically after hours. Many employees carry and use cell phones, laptops and other devices throughout their waking hours. Employees often get involved in work-related tasks on these devices. For example, a manager may tell a non-exempt employee to check in regularly on her cell phone while on vacation. Or an employee may uses his laptop at night and on weekends to keep a project going. The basic rule: When a non-exempt employee engages in work-related activities that benefit the employer (even voluntarily), the time is compensable.

8. Failing to pay for time spent at after-hours meetings. When attendance at a meeting outside normal work hours is required and the subject and activity at the meeting is work-related, the employees' must be paid for the time.

9. Failing to keep required records. Federal law requires employers to keep time-worked records. So if there is a dispute with an employee about hours and pay and the employer is unable to show accurately recorded time records, courts will favor the employee's claims and records.

10. Treating exempt employees as if they are non-exempt employees. When an employer treats an exempt employee as if he or she is an hourly paid non-exempt employee, the employer risks losing that employee's exempt status. Even worse, if the employer treats an exempt employee like an hourly paid non-exempt employee, the employer may also lose the exempt status of all other employees in the same job classification working for the same managers responsible for the wrong treatment.

How do employers treat otherwise exempt employees like hourly paid non-exempt employees? By improperly basing their pay on hours worked (or not worked) rather than on a daily, weekly, or monthly salary.

For example, let's say an exempt employee paid a salary begins coming to work two or three hours late on Mondays. The boss deducts amounts from the employee's paycheck for the hours not worked. By treating the employee like an hourly paid non-exempt employee, the employer has changed the individual's status.

11. Substituting comp time for overtime pay. Under federal law, compensatory time off or comp time in place of receiving overtime pay is generally only legal for government employees. Federal law generally requires that employees get paid overtime for all hours worked over 40 in a seven-day workweek established by the employer. (Note: Some states require overtime pay for hours worked over eight in a day.)

12. Taking unauthorized deductions from paychecks. An employer can only legally deduct from an employee's earned pay the amounts required or authorized by law (such as Social Security, income tax deductions, and court-ordered garnisheed amounts) as well as deductions authorized by the employee (such as deductions for insurance premiums and loan payments).

Examples: An employer cannot deduct amounts from an employee's pay to cover damages to the organization's equipment. And an employer cannot withhold a departing employee's final paycheck as a way of collecting an amount the individual owes on a loan previously obtained from the employer -- unless the employee has given authorization in advance.

13. Not paying minimum wage when required. The WHD investigates employers who violate requirements to pay covered employees at least the federal minimum wage.

For example, in January, Los Angeles clothing manufacturer Joe's Jeans paid $158,950 in back wages to 110 garment workers after an investigation. The WHD found employees were paid on a piece-rate basis without regard for the minimum wage and overtime requirements. Investigators also found weekend work was not recorded on employee time cards.

See the right-hand box for frequently-asked questions about minimum wage.

14. Failing to abide by state laws. States may have their own version of federal wage and hour rules. So employers need to be aware of and comply with the laws in the states where they have employees.

Example of One Company's Recent Wage and Hour Violations

Sushi Alive, a Tampa, Florida, restaurant, agreed in May to pay $54,407 in back wages to 14 employees, following an investigation by the Labor Department's Wage and Hour Division.
Covered, nonexempt employees must be paid at least the federal minimum wage, although tipped employees can earn less (see box below). Employers can create a tip pooling or sharing arrangement, but a valid tip pool cannot include employees who do not customarily and regularly receive tips, such as dishwashers, cooks and janitors.
According to the DOL, Sushi Alive required servers to share tips with dishwashers, cooks and other employees who did not customarily earn tips, thereby invalidating the pool arrangement. In addition, the employer violated federal law by:

Deducting the cost of uniforms from servers' paychecks, which reduced their wages below minimum wage.

Failing to keep accurate records.

Not adequately compensating servers who worked more than 40 hours a week.

Minimum Wage Q & As
 

Q.

How much is the federal minimum wage?
 

A.

The federal minimum wage for covered nonexempt employees is currently $7.25 per hour. Many states also have minimum wage laws. If an employee is subject to both the state and federal minimum wage laws, the employee is entitled to the higher minimum wage rate. Various minimum wage exceptions apply under certain circumstances.

Q.

What happens if state law requires a higher minimum wage than federal law?
 

A.

If state law requires a higher minimum wage, the higher standard applies.
 

Q.

What is the minimum wage for workers who receive tips?
 

A.

An employer can pay a tipped employee not less than $2.13 an hour in wages if that amount, plus tips, equal at least the federal minimum wage; the employee retains all tips; and the employee regularly receives more than $30 a month in tips. If an employee's tips combined with the employer's $2.13-an-hour wage do not equal the federal minimum wage, the employer must make up the difference. Some states have minimum wage laws for tipped employees. An employee is entitled to the provisions of each law that provide the greater benefits.

Q.

Do teenagers have to be paid the minimum wage?
 

A.

A minimum wage of $4.25 per hour applies to young workers under the age of 20 during their first 90 consecutive calendar days of employment, as long as their work doesn't displace other workers. After 90 consecutive days or when the employee turns 20 (whichever comes first), the employee must receive minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. Other programs that allow less-than-full federal minimum wage apply to workers with disabilities, full-time students, and student-learners employed pursuant to sub-minimum wage certificates. These programs are not limited to young workers.


 


Strategic Shift on Undocumented Workers:

Several years ago, the worst-case scenario for businesses that hired illegal workers was often a slap on the wrist and a relatively small fine. These days, however, having illegal workers on the payroll could result in an employer's arrest and hundreds of thousands of dollars in seized assets.

This is due to a crackdown by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE), which assumed authority over these matters from the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) in 2003. While INS agents generally issued warnings and imposed fines, the ICE has taken a much more aggressive stance of pursuing criminal prosecution of employers.

This change in policy has been largely influenced by the Department of Homeland Security, which has been under tremendous pressure to tighten border control. Hundreds of employer arrests have taken place thus far, a trend that shows no signs of abating. This groundswell has spread to other branches of the legislative and judicial system as well, including new strict state statutes and competitor litigation.

States Are Getting in on the Act. In addition to ICE actions, many states have passed legislation recently to penalize companies with illegal workers on the payroll. The laws cover a wide range of penalties such as hefty fines and prohibitions against businesses with undocumented workers being awarded state contracts.

Some businesses have also begun to sue other businesses on the grounds that they achieve an unfair advantage through the practice of hiring illegal workers. While these lawsuits are taking place in California under that state's unfair-competition laws, other states are considering similar measures that could open up more lawsuits.

Be Safe, Rather Than Sorry. With more than ten million estimated illegal immigrants in the United States, employers are in a potentially vulnerable position when it comes to hiring employees. Here are some steps that can help protect your organization when it comes to examining job applicants:

By law, employers must complete an I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification form for each new hire and keep the forms on file. Photocopy the documents provided by each employee. Maintain the copies with the I-9. Former employees' forms must be kept for three years from the hiring date or one year after termination, whichever is later. If an outside firm provides your organization with contractors, however, these responsibilities may be shifted to them.

The scrutiny with which you examine I-9 documents can be subject to litigation. The hiring process should objectively and appropriately judge documents and there should be transparency when it comes to your hiring practices and your continuing to monitor any employee's citizenship status. Know which documents you can ask for. Let employees choose. Don't ask for particular documents or more documents than are required. Employees or applicants can choose the proof they want to offer and companies have faced lawsuits for specifying certain documents over others. Accept documents that appear genuine although you aren't responsible for confirming their authenticity. It isn't wise to conclude that documents are false and routinely investigate authenticity without proper cause. ICE authorities don't expect employers to be immigration experts, but you should have sufficient knowledge to understand if a document is consistent with an employee's claimed status.

Avoid restrictive hiring practices. For qualified applicants, don't question the expiration date of work authorization or ask for documentation to confirm the date. You are able, however, to require new hires or employees to periodically show proof of continuing eligibility. Establish procedures for responding to "no-match" letters received from the Social Security Administration. These letters inform employers when a number submitted on an I-9 does not match the name for that number on the Social Security database.

Don't jump the gun. While it is wise to conduct the I-9 verification process before a new hire starts work, don't initiate it before a job offer is made and accepted. Not hiring someone after seeing documents that reveal citizenship status, age, and national origin could be grounds for a discrimination claim.

Time Table for Completing the Process

Employers must complete the I-9 verification process within three business days of an employee's first day on the job. The only exception to this rule is when new employees lack a required piece of documentation, such as a Social Security card for example, and show a receipt to prove they have applied for one. In such a case, all documents must be presented and the I-9 form completed within 90 days of the first day of work. If the documentation is not produced, the person cannot legally continue to work and the employer has the right to suspend the employee without pay until the documents are obtained.

While these requirements may seem stringent, complying with them can, in the long run, save you potential financial penalties and legal trouble. If you need more information, consult with your attorney or human resources adviser.


 


1099 Rules are Repealed:

President Obama has signed a law that repeals two sets of rules that had business owners, company managers and landlords up in arms because of the paperwork nightmare they created. The rules that involved businesses issuing a blizzard of 1099 forms were created by two laws enacted in 2010. Rental property owners had to begin complying with one of the sets of rules this year. The second set for other types of businesses was not scheduled to go into effect until next year.

The new rules ignited an immediate firestorm of criticism, but repealing them took longer than some expected.

Thankfully, all the attempted 1099 rule changes have finally been quashed by the Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act, which was signed into law on April 14, 2011.

Just so you understand where we stand now, here's the 1099 story from beginning to end. We will start with the longstanding 1099 rules, which will now continue to apply without any changes.

Longstanding 1099 Rules Remain in Force

For many years, businesses have been required to report various types of payments to the IRS and to recipient taxpayers.

For instance, when a business pays $600 or more during a calendar year to an unincorporated independent contractor for services rendered, the business must file a Form 1099-MISC with the IRS to report the total amount paid in that year. The business must also send a copy of the Form 1099-MISC to the payee (a so-called payee statement). This reporting procedure helps the contractor remember to include the payments as income on his or her tax return, and it helps the IRS to make sure that happens.

Under the longstanding rules, other types of payments that businesses must report to the IRS on 1099s and to payees on payee statements include:

Commissions, fees, and other forms of compensation paid to a single unincorporated payee when the total amount paid in a calendar year is $600 or more.

Interest, rents, royalties, annuities, and other income items paid to a single unincorporated payee when the total amount paid in a calendar year is $600 or more.

When a 1099 is required, it must show the total amount of payments in the calendar year, the name and address of the payee, the tax ID number (TIN) of the payee, contact information for the payer, and the payer's TIN. (For privacy reasons, it's OK to show a truncated TIN on a 1099 that reports payments to an individual recipient.)

If your business doesn't have a recipient's TIN, you may be required to institute backup federal income tax withholding at a 28 percent rate on payments to that payee. 

In most cases, the rules summarized above apply equally to payments made by non-profit organizations, because they are generally considered to be businesses for 1099 reporting purposes.

For 2011, if a payer fails to file a proper 1099 with the government, the IRS can assess a penalty of $100 or more per failure. For 2011, if a payer fails to send a proper payee statement, the IRS can assess an additional penalty of $100 or more for each failure. (Internal Revenue Code Sections 6721, 6722, and 6723)

Important: Penalties for failing to file 1099s and issue payee statements were increased by a 2010 law. The increased penalties remain in effect. To sum up, each time you fail to file a 1099 and issue the related payee statement, the IRS can still assess a penalty of $200 or more.

Most Payments to Corporations Need Not Be Reported

Most payments to corporations are exempt from any 1099 reporting requirements. There are a few exceptions. For instance, payments of $600 or more in a calendar year to a corporate law firm must be reported on a Form 1099-MISC for that year.

Example 1: Your business makes monthly payments to rent office space from a corporate lessor. Under longstanding rules that will now remain in force, there is no 1099 reporting requirement for the payments, because they are made to a corporation. 

Payments for Property Need Not Be Reported

There is generally no requirement to issue 1099s to report payments for property (merchandise, raw materials, equipment, and just about anything else you can put your hands on).

Example 2: Your business buys a delivery van, display shelving, and computer equipment. Under the longstanding rules that will now remain in force, there is no 1099 reporting requirement for these payments, because they are for property.

2010 Legislation Tried to Change the Rules

Last year's healthcare legislation and a separate small business law attempted to make big changes to the 1099 reporting rules. The repealed changes are briefly summarized below.

Payments to Corporations: Starting in 2012, if your business paid a corporation $600 or more in a calendar year, you generally would have been required to file a 1099 and issue a statement to the payee.

Also, your business would have been required to obtain a taxpayer ID number from each corporate payee to avoid the requirement for backup federal income tax withholding.

On the other side of the coin, if your business is incorporated, it would have had to supply customers with your company's TIN to avoid backup withholding on payments to your business.

Payments for Property: Starting in 2012, if your business paid $600 or more in a calendar year to any payee as "amounts in consideration for property," you would have been required to file a 1099 and issue a payee statement. Once again, the term "property" means equipment, merchandise, raw materials, and many other items.

Also, your business would have been required to obtain a TIN from each affected payee to avoid the requirement for backup withholding of federal income tax.

On the other side of the coin, if your business sells property, you would have had to supply customers with your TIN to avoid backup withholding on payments to your business.

Payments of Gross Proceeds: Starting in 2012, a third new rule would have required filing a 1099 and payee statement if your business paid $600 or more in "gross proceeds" to any payee in a calendar year. Apparently, this provision was intended to force the filing of millions of 1099s and payee statements to report business expenditures for things like meals at unincorporated restaurants, repairs of business vehicles at unincorporated auto shops, and seminars presented by unincorporated providers (the list could go on and on).

Payments by Rental Property Owners: Starting this year, owning rental property would have generally been considered a "business" for purposes of the 1099 reporting rules. Therefore, property owners would have generally been required to file 1099s and issue payee statements for any unincorporated service providers that were paid $600 or more during 2011 (for jobs including yard care, maintenance, and accounting). Starting in 2012, rental property owners would have been required to comply with the other burdensome 1099 changes explained earlier.

All of these now-repealed mandates would have undoubtedly required many millions of additional 1099s and payee statements each year.

Where We Stand Now

Thanks to the just-passed Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act, none of the attempted 1099 changes will take effect. So if your business is currently handling 1099s and payee statements without any problems, you can continue with the status quo. On the other hand, if you know you have compliance deficiencies, the harsher penalties that are now in effect dictate in favor of cleaning up your act (the harsher penalties will remain in force).

Finally, you might wonder how Congress compensated for the estimated $22 billion of revenue that was allegedly lost by repealing the attempted 1099 changes. The Feds will try to recoup the revenue by collecting more "excess advance payments" of health insurance premium assistance credits collected by individuals. This change will take effect in 2014.

Consult with your tax adviser with any questions you may have about issuing 1099 forms in your situation.


 


Employer Victory after Lawsuit over Reduced Hours:


 Court: Less Overtime Pay
 Did Not Amount to Discrimination

Many companies routinely change the work schedules of their employees due to seasonal fluctuations. In addition, some businesses are forced to reduce the number of hours employees work because of changes in economic conditions.

When scheduled hours are scaled back, of course, the employees' paychecks are also cut. In one case, a convenience store assistant manager charged that his employer discriminated against him on the basis of his age after the company reduced his overtime hours. He sued his employer for discrimination, retaliation, and a hostile work environment under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and state law.

Charges of discrimination are not unusual these days, but as this case illustrates, it takes more than mere accusations to prevail in court. Essentially, the employer must have initiated some sort of adverse action against the employee - such as a wrongful termination, demotion or a change in job conditions - for a lawsuit to have merit.

Facts of the case: John Baucom was a 68-year-old assistant manager at a Minnesota convenience store who suffered from chronic back pain and a heart problem. In the lawsuit, it was alleged that the company's district manager told the store manager that Baucom's age and health conditions were a "hindrance" and his hours should be reduced. He also alleged that the store manager called him slow and old and ridiculed him.

Baucom generally worked 43 to 45 hours weekly. When his hours were cut to less than 40 hours a week - in effect, reducing the overtime pay he normally received - the assistant manager sued the employer under in U.S. District Court in Minnesota.

In addition to the change in hours, Baucom's schedule was changed from working during the day with Sundays off to working nights and weekends. He also received four "corrective action notices" from the company for not requesting identification from a young person purchasing tobacco, not providing adequate documentation for medically related work absences, and other events.

After the lawsuit was filed, the employer reviewed Baucom's performance and rated him "below standard." However, he received additional training and the store manager noted improvement and granted him a raise. He continued to be employed by the company as the case went to court.

The District Court ruled against the employee and eventually, the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals agreed. Reason: The courts said Baucom failed to meet the requisite burden of proof. Some of the findings:

1. Baucom was unable to show that the scheduling change was caused by motives other than the store managing its employees in the normal course of business. His fluctuating hours, the court stated, reflected "a normal retail employee's schedule, with many peaks and valleys and rarely the same hours worked in consecutive weeks."

2. Some of Baucom's reduced hours during the period in question were the result of his voluntarily taking vacation and sick leave.

3. The company "instituted a company wide policy to decrease labor costs affecting all employees, including Baucom."

4. The court concluded that the resulting overtime pay loss due to a difference of a few hours work time doesn't constitute discrimination. In other words, the impact on the employee was minimal and in order to prove an adverse action, Baucom had to prove a "material employment disadvantage."

Similarly, the court ruled that the reduction in hours did not result from any retaliation towards Baucom or create a hostile work environment. (Baucom, Jr. v. Holiday Companies, Inc., No. 05-1393, 11/10/05)


Fuel prices continue to affect delivery costs:

Rising fuel prices are continuing to have an impact on delivery costs.  UPS raised their fees substantially January 1st and continue to impose fuel surcharges to each delivery.  Courier fees have risen as well along with fuel surcharges.  U.S. Mail prices also increased again effective 4/17/2011. We can all understand why delivery companies must raise prices and there appears to be no end in sight.  It was predicted today (4/22/2011) that gas prices could rise another 35% by this summer.  Not a good sign for a 'recovering' economy!  Should the predictions come true, you can expect delivery costs to continue to rise.

How can we combat delivery costs?  Payrite offers a 'paperless' solution.  Your employee checks can be direct deposited and the employee would have their own online access to their payroll records to view or print copies of pay stubs.  Employer reports are viewable / printable online by a designated payroll administrator.  You may also elect to opt in to our DVD subscription service on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis.  This service provides you a DVD with a copy of all reports and checks produced for the year.  Contact us for more information if you don't already utilize these services.


Health Savings Account limits announced for 2012:

With Health Savings Accounts (HSAs), individuals and businesses buy less expensive health insurance policies with high deductibles. Contributions to the accounts are made on a pre-tax basis. The money can accumulate year after year tax free, and be withdrawn tax free to pay for a variety of medical expenses such as doctor visits, prescriptions, chiropractic care and premiums for long-term-care insurance.

Participating employers can also contribute to accounts, on behalf of their employees.

Here are the 2012 limits for individual and family coverage, announced by the IRS in Revenue Procedure 2011-32. They are determined after the IRS applies cost-of-living adjustment rules, and the changes in the Consumer Price Index for the relevant period.

 

Health Savings Accounts

2012

2011

Self-only coverage annual minimum deductible

$1,200

$1,200

Self-only coverage maximum out of pocket

$6,050

$5,950

Self-only coverage maximum HSA contribution

$3,100

$3,050

Family coverage annual minimum deductible (Family coverage can include a spouse and any dependents)

$2,400

$2,400

Family coverage maximum out of pocket

$12,100

$11,900

Family coverage maximum HSA contribution

$6,250

$6,150

 


Questions and Answers about overtime:

The federal rules governing overtime seem to grow more complicated every year. To know who is entitled to overtime pay and who is exempt from it under federal wage and hour laws requires close examination.

Here are answers to questions you might have about how the current rules apply to your business.


Note:
These answers discuss applications of the federal overtime rules. Some states have rules that differ from federal rules. Federal rules that are less favorable than state rules do not apply in the state. Find out how your state law treats employee overtime.

Can You "Round Up" - or Down?

There's no doubt about it. Overtime pay is a tricky issue. One recent case illustrates how employers can get into trouble calculating hours.
The FLSA allows an employer to round off hours worked, usually to the nearest 15 minutes, but such practices must be equally fair to both employer and employee. They cannot always result in less pay for employees.
In 2004, a Michigan hospital paid nearly $910,000 in back wages resulting from FLSA violations involving rounding and other issues.
Employees of Mt. Clemens General Hospital who started work early or worked late were only paid if they stayed a full 15 minutes. Otherwise, the time was rounded to the nearest quarter hour.
After being notified by the Labor Department of possible violations, the hospital performed a voluntary two-year audit. It was also cited for other technical overtime violations when employees received on-call and incentive payments for working extra shifts.

Salaried Employees

Q.

All of our office employees are paid salaries. They usually work 40 hours a week. However, sometimes they put in about 35 hours weekly and occasionally, they work up to 46 hours in a week. Do we have to pay them overtime when they go over 40 hours?
 

A.

Just because they're paid a salary instead of an hourly rate doesn't make salaried employees exempt from overtime pay. Salaried employees, who earn $455 weekly or more ($23,660 annually), and perform executive, administrative, or professional duties (as defined in the federal rules) are exempt from overtime pay. Salaried office employees who earn less than $455 weekly (or less than $23,660 annually) and those who do not primarily perform executive, administrative or professional duties are not exempt from overtime pay.

Defining Exempt Duties

Q.

We understand that employees who are executives, administrators and certain professionals are exempt from overtime. However, in our business, these exempt employees sometimes do tasks that really aren't typical of an executive, administrator or professional. How can we make sure that we're treating these employees correctly?
 

A.

First, click here for an overview from the Labor Department about overtime. If you're still uncertain about applying these rules, contact the Wage and Hour Division office of the U.S. Department of Labor in your state or consult with your payroll or human resources professional.

Regarding exempt employees who sometimes do work that really isn't typical of a manager, executive, administrator, or professional, the federal rules state that, to be exempt, employees' primary duties must be executive, managing, administrative, or professional in nature. According to the federal rules, "Determination of an employee's primary duty must be based on all the facts in a particular case, with the major emphasis on the character of the employee's job as a whole."

Computer-Related Jobs

Q.

Our company has computer employees on salary. Is this still appropriate under the current rules?

 

A.

Yes, if the type of computer work they do qualifies for exempt status and if you pay them enough. Here's a summary of computer-related duties that qualify an employee for exempt status:

1. The application of systems analysis techniques and procedures to determine hardware, software or system functional specifications. This includes consulting with users.

2. The design, development, documentation, analysis, creation, testing or modification of computer systems or programs, based on and related to design specifications.

3. The design, documentation, testing, creation or modification of computer programs related to machine operating systems.

4. A combination of the above duties, which require the same level of skills to perform.

If you pay an employee doing these types of computer tasks at least $455 per week, or you pay at least $27.63 hourly, the employee is exempt from overtime pay.
 

Sales Personnel

Q.

Our sales people spend most of their time calling on customer accounts outside of our office. They've always been paid a base salary, plus commission. Can we keep on paying them this way under the current rules?
 

A.

Outside sales people are exempt from overtime and can be paid on a salary-plus-commission basis, if:

 

  • Their primary duties are making sales, or obtaining orders or contracts.

  • They customarily and regularly do this work away from your place of business.

Note: The minimum salary requirement for an exempt employee does not apply to outside sales reps.
 

Salaried and Nonexempt

Q.

Many of our company's employees who have always been exempt from overtime are now nonexempt because they are paid less than the stipulated amount - even though they perform exempt-type duties. Some of them feel they've been demoted. They seem to equate being exempt with management. Any suggestions on how to handle this?

 

A.

For some people, being salaried is prestigious and more important than earning a little more occasionally in overtime. For these employees, the answer is simple: Continue to pay them a minimum guaranteed salary just as you have been. But also pay them overtime pay for any overtime hours worked (based on their hourly rate, their salary divided by 40 hours). Of course, you can only use this strategy if you are willing to guarantee a weekly salary, even when the employees work less than 40 hours in a week.

If their annual salaries were close to $23,660 a year ($455 a week) in the past, you could raise their salaries above this amount. Then, as long as their duties continue to be those of an exempt employee, they will continue to be salaried and exempt.
 

Deductions from Exempt Salaries
 

Q.

In the past, if our business made deductions from an exempt employee's salary for almost any reason (except paid vacation and paid time off), we ran the risk of the employee losing exempt status. If, for example, we wanted to discipline salaried employees by making deductions from their paychecks, we could get into serious trouble. Now that the rules have changed, can we make disciplinary deductions from an exempt person's salary without getting penalized?
 

A.


The general rule hasn't changed. If an employer makes deductions from an exempt person's salary, similar to the kind made in nonexempt employees' pay, the employee is being treated as a nonexempt employee and the exempt status is lost. In other words, an exempt employee is entitled to his or her full salary for any week that work is performed, regardless of the number of hours.

 

Since the rules changed, an employer can suspend an exempt employee without pay for serious conduct violations (such as sexual harassment or workplace violence). Your company can discipline with partial-week suspensions, without pay, for misconduct. These type of suspensions and discipline actions do not put the exempt status in danger.

Remember: By making unauthorized deductions from an exempt employee's salary, an employer risks losing not just the individual's status but also the status of the entire class of exempt employees at the company.

For protection from liability for possible improper deductions from exempt salaries, employers must:

1. Clearly communicate a policy prohibiting improper salary deductions.
2. Include in the policy a complaint mechanism.
3. Reimburse employees for improper deductions.
4. Make a good-faith commitment to comply in the future.


[NOTE: Information and guidance in these articles are intended to provide interesting and helpful information on the subjects covered. It is not intended to provide a legal service for readers' individual needs. For legal guidance in your specific situations, always consult with an attorney who is familiar with employment law and labor issues.]
 


        Copyright © Payrite, 1984 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.